Inferno (2016) 720p YIFY Movie

Inferno (2016)

When Robert Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Dr. Sienna Brooks, and together they must race across Europe against the clock to foil a deadly global plot.

IMDB: 6.239 Likes

  • Genre: Action | Adventure
  • Quality: 720p
  • Size: 911.96M
  • Resolution: 1280*800 / 23.976 fpsfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 115
  • IMDB Rating: 6.2/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 648 / 3677

The Synopsis for Inferno (2016) 720p

Academy Award? winner Ron Howard returns to direct the latest bestseller in Dan Brown's (Da Vinci Code) billion-dollar Robert Langdon series, Inferno, which finds the famous symbologist (again played by Tom Hanks) on a trail of clues tied to the great Dante himself. When Langdon wakes up in an Italian hospital with amnesia, he teams up with Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones), a doctor he hopes will help him recover his memories. Together, they race across Europe and against the clock to stop a madman from unleashing a global virus that would wipe out half of the world's population.


The Director and Players for Inferno (2016) 720p

[Director]Ron Howard
[Role:]Tom Hanks
[Role:]Irrfan Khan
[Role:]Felicity Jones


The Reviews for Inferno (2016) 720p


Reviewed bynalandyVote: 6/10/10

TL;DR: This movie was good but forgettable. Reading the book beforehandis a positive here and you will want to go see it, but keepexpectations down and expect a radically altered story with no lastingimpression. If you haven't read the book, prepare to be confused, butit can still be an entertaining ride.

Edition watched: 2D IMAX

The largest positive for this movie is Tom Hanks. Hank's role here is aslight departure from how he previously played the role, due to thecircumstances that are made apparent from the very beginning (but Iwon't spoil), and yet he was excellent again as Robert Langdon. Asidefrom Hanks, the story was muddled but chase-movie action and constantchanges of beautiful scenery makes this entertaining if forgettable.

I have read the book (and liked it) and I went to see it with 2 peoplewho had not read it.

For those who haven't read the book, you should know that this is notlike the other 2 Dan Brown movies. Those stories dealt with secrets andpuzzles from many years ago (hundreds or thousands in some cases) andthey had that Indiana Jones for the art history major feel to them. Inthis movie, all the puzzles are manufactured by a modern day characterin the story, so it almost completely lacks that Indiana Jones feel.Even though I had warned my movie companions about this, both werequite disappointed by this aspect.

However, the biggest problem my non-book reading movie companions hadwas confusion. As someone who knew what was going on, even I felt theway they injected some story elements and then dropped them just asfast was a bit dizzying. Given that this movie was adapted for thescreen and had radically altered elements from the book, the handlingof the story telling was sub par.

Both of my movie companions felt the movie was entertaining but nothingspecial. One sentence opinion: "It was OK and I enjoyed it." and "Itwas OK, let's go eat."

For those who have read the book, in my opinion this movie departsradically from the source material. That said, reading the book is anadvantage and might be a compelling reason to go see this. Knowing thebook-story means you will know what is going on, even through elementsthat were not in the book and/or were presented poorly (e.g. skinrash). I found the changes made for a better experience since I wasn'tjust seeing a rehash of what I had read. That said, among severaldisappointments, I was looking forward to a Vasari Corridor scene and Iwas very much let down.

One thing to note, Dan Brown's message was pretty much lost and Iwonder if that was intentional? Even the ending, which in the book wasused to punctuate Dan Brown's obvious point, is radically changed inthe movie. So while the basic story is similar, the actual take away Ileft the theater with was very different from the book. I mark this asnegative because the book made me think about what I had taken for agiven, the movie simply entertained me and went away afterwards.

Overall, as someone who read the book, I enjoyed the movie but did feellet down.

Reviewed byRobin VangampelaereVote: 5/10/10

I never did read the Dan Brown books and solely went to see this moviewith the previous two movies as background. What a disappointment!

The movie starts with Robert Langdon having flashbacks and weirdvisions. By itself nothing out of the ordinary weren't it for thetedious assembly. In stead of getting people invested in what ishappening with the professor, you just get white flashes alternatedwith some scenes that do intrigue until they give those again a genericfilter you can even make yourself in Windows Movie Maker.

When the movie eventually gets into the story it's rushing from oneplace to the next. If this was an ordinary action movie that would beacceptable, but absolutely not in a Dan Brown movie. The attractivepart of Langdon is the puzzle solving, the adventure, the mysteries.Not someone who says:"Let's go trough this door. I know it is therebecause I read it in a book."

The ending is the worst of the whole movie. Again, a lot of action, butthat is not what the Dan Brown-series is about. I heard that in thebook the ending is totally different and I really wonder why theychanged it, but this is a review of a movie and not from the book. So,I have to give the ending the fame of one of the worst endings of 2016for me. No puzzle, no big reveal, just some action.

Overall if you like Langdon and you wished for something like Angels &Demons without the riddles and with even more action than you are atthe right place, but that's absolutely not what I wanted or expectedfrom this movie. I wish I could go back to the static, immersiveLangdon from The Da Vinci Code who paused here and there and where thehistory and the characters intrigued him and me.

Reviewed byGuy JeffriesVote: 5/10/10

So, Ron Howard, Tom Hanks and Hans Zimmer return for the third movieadaptation of Dan Brown's bestselling symbolist and iconologyprofessional, Robert Langdon. Though we seem to be ironically missing,The Lost Symbol where Langdon tramples over Washington's Masonichistory, which is currently in development but with Howard only sittingin a producers chair.

Howard's direction, or the editing seems sloppy and rushed withnoticeable out-of-sync audio. It shows that they struggled withcramming as much as the butchered novel into the 121min runtime,missing possible reshoots as some of the performances are really not upto scratch, namely Sidse Babett Knudsen and Omar Sy.

Hanks, slips into Langdon mode totally as expected and the delightfulFelicity Jones plays the Bond-girl style sidekick very well as we watchthem try to figure out the same puzzles and twists Langdon is usuallypitted against. It's unfortunate that the more I think about it, themore silly the elaborate idea becomes.

There's inconsistencies and obvious inaccuracies with the book and Iwonder how much power Dan Brown had as executive producer. The storyhere appears much weaker than the novel, as does some of itscharacters, especially the reworking of Irrfan Khan's "Provost". A lotof the reasonings are just weak and unrealistic which is a shame forsomething which could actually happen.

Zimmer's score is of the recognisable Langdon theme but, it's beendigitised adding a terrible technical feel that might accompany aespionage thriller. Again, giving me the assumption that the film wasrushed and not the polished film it should have been.

What's possibly the biggest disappointment of the film is the factualreality that the story is based on, and as much as we all might likethe previous, popular Brown conspiracies, this story is a real loomingcrisis. It lacks the serious impact the book gives of the currentpopulation crisis, the fact that we're nearly 9 billion people on aplanet that can currently only support an estimated 4.

It fails to question what we should or what would we do in thissituation, which we are actually in and is a serious topic for worldgovernments, councils and organisations like WHO. Should we actively dosomething about population control or let nature take it's naturalcourse. I don't honestly believe this film has audiences going home andtaking a long hard think about the issue or the implications of virusesand other methods of population control. The real question being, do welet people die or save as many as we can to keep mankind fromextinction.

True to most trilogy tragedies, this is certainly the worse of theseries so far and I'm hoping The Lost Symbol doesn't fall to the samefate with a rumoured Mark Romanek at the helm. I had low expectationsto begin with and unfortunately it didn't hit the mark.

Running Time: 6 The Cast: 6 Performance: 6 Direction: 4 Story: 5Script: 5 Creativity: 7 Soundtrack: 4 Job Description: 3 The ExtraBonus Points: 0 Would I buy the Bluray?: actually yes, only to be partof the series.

46% 5/10

Inferno (2016) 720p Related Movies

Inferno (2016) Poster

Inferno (2016)

Shadows in Paradise (2010) 1080p Poster

Shadows in Paradise (2010) 1080p

Pete's Dragon (2016) Poster

Pete's Dragon (2016)

Battleground (1949) Poster

Battleground (1949)

Death Race 2050 (2017) Poster

Death Race 2050 (2017)

Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior (2006) Poster

Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior (2006)

Zombie Apocalypse: Redemption (2011) Poster

Zombie Apocalypse: Redemption (2011)

Kung Pow: Enter the Fist (2002) Poster

Kung Pow: Enter the Fist (2002)